Re: process for including changes in 1.0

On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 04:29:54PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
>...
> -1 on committing votes into a "STATUS" file in our main source repository. I hate the thought of, between the source changes, a load of commits like this:
>
> r10000: julianfoad: Voted for issue 9999.
> ...

What's wrong with that? The revision numbers don't mean anything. So what
if we burn through a bunch of them?

The STATUS file presents a nice summary; hella better than trying to
formulate some weirdo IZ query. It also presents the voting much better,
since you can actually list people's names for each +1, rather than doing
some funky running tally which totally loses history.

And yah... I'm not sure why Karl is so hell-bent on the issue tracker when
the voting seems to point towards a STATUS file.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org