[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: process for including changes in 1.0

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-12-16 16:07:25 CET

Heh. Okay, it's official -- there is just no way to tell which way
(issue tracker vs STATUS file) most developers prefer without a formal
poll. :-)

Anyone who wants to conduct such a poll is welcome to. I'm content to
try the issue tracker way and see if it hurts.

-Karl

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> +1 on the STATUS file. Much easier to provide a short summary, to see
> *who* voted *which* way, and it is versioned. I can open the file, zip
> through and add a dozen votes, commit, and be done. Changing a dozen
> issues is *significantly* harder. (IZ isn't all that hard, but compared to
> a file edit?)
>
> Most developers are signed up for commit email, but a relative few are
> signed up on the issues@ mailing list. From an awareness standpoint, the
> file is better. Especially for people who are lurking/observing.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 16 16:56:23 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.