Re: process for including changes in 1.0

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:09:45PM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2003, at 5:28 PM, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>...
> > Well, what the heck. It seems most people prefer the issue-based
> > solution, or are at least okay with it; I'm the one being picky here.
> > Let's try using the issue tracker and see if it works. If it's too
> > painful to be borne, we'll notice pretty quickly.
>
> For the record, I prefer a STATUS file, I think it's hugely easier to
> use than the issue tracker for this kind of thing.

+1 on the STATUS file. Much easier to provide a short summary, to see
*who* voted *which* way, and it is versioned. I can open the file, zip
through and add a dozen votes, commit, and be done. Changing a dozen
issues is *significantly* harder. (IZ isn't all that hard, but compared to
a file edit?)

Most developers are signed up for commit email, but a relative few are
signed up on the issues@ mailing list. From an awareness standpoint, the
file is better. Especially for people who are lurking/observing.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org