On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:00:41AM +0000, Gareth McCaughan wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2003 2:00 am, Gareth McCaughan wrote:
> > I wrote:
> > > Anyway... my feelings on this are not strong, and it seems
> > > as if the general preference is for having only the one function
> > > in the API. If I haven't heard any dissenting voices in, say,
> > > a day's time then I'll send in a version of the patch that
> > > has only one function. (Called svn_client_revert, of course.)
> >
> > ... So I'm doing so. Patch and log message are attached.
>
> I've not had any further feedback, so I assume the patch
> is utterly perfect and without flaw :-). Um, should I open an
> issue for this, or what?
Filed as issue 1603:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1603
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 17 01:10:59 2003