Re: [PATCH] Re: "svn revert" performance

On Monday 03 November 2003 2:00 am, Gareth McCaughan wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Anyway... my feelings on this are not strong, and it seems
> > as if the general preference is for having only the one function
> > in the API. If I haven't heard any dissenting voices in, say,
> > a day's time then I'll send in a version of the patch that
> > has only one function. (Called svn_client_revert, of course.)
>
> ... So I'm doing so. Patch and log message are attached.

I've not had any further feedback, so I assume the patch
is utterly perfect and without flaw :-). Um, should I open an
issue for this, or what?

-- 
g
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org