[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[PATCH] Re: "svn revert" performance

From: Gareth McCaughan <gareth.mccaughan_at_pobox.com>
Date: 2003-11-03 03:00:21 CET

I wrote:

> Anyway... my feelings on this are not strong, and it seems
> as if the general preference is for having only the one function
> in the API. If I haven't heard any dissenting voices in, say,
> a day's time then I'll send in a version of the patch that
> has only one function. (Called svn_client_revert, of course.)

... So I'm doing so. Patch and log message are attached.

> I forgot to mention: all the tests pass with the patch applied.
> This is interesting because there *is* an externally visible
> change: without --quiet, the way in which nonexistent paths
> are reported is a bit different from before. I'm guessing that
> this isn't a problem.

Still true.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Mon Nov 3 02:59:15 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.