[PATCH] Re: "svn revert" performance

I wrote:

> Anyway... my feelings on this are not strong, and it seems
> as if the general preference is for having only the one function
> in the API. If I haven't heard any dissenting voices in, say,
> a day's time then I'll send in a version of the patch that
> has only one function. (Called svn_client_revert, of course.)

... So I'm doing so. Patch and log message are attached.

> I forgot to mention: all the tests pass with the patch applied.
> This is interesting because there *is* an externally visible
> change: without --quiet, the way in which nonexistent paths
> are reported is a bit different from before. I'm guessing that
> this isn't a problem.

Still true.

-- 
g

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org