[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn_fs_delete() vs. svn_fs_delete_tree()

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-11-05 04:01:09 CET

C. Michael Pilato wrote:

>For the life of me, I've never understood why we have both
>svn_fs_delete() (which only works on files) and svn_fs_delete_tree()
>(which works on both files and directories) in our public API. Our
>code always calls svn_fs_delete_tree() because it saves us a 'kind'
>check. Anyone opposed to losing svn_fs_delete(), and then renaming
>svn_fs_delete_tree() to svn_fs_delete()? Am I missing something

Kill it. I'll even sharpen the guillotine for you. Anything that
simplifies the FS API gets a +1 from me.

Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 5 04:01:47 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.