[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

svn_fs_delete() vs. svn_fs_delete_tree()

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-11-04 23:45:56 CET

For the life of me, I've never understood why we have both
svn_fs_delete() (which only works on files) and svn_fs_delete_tree()
(which works on both files and directories) in our public API. Our
code always calls svn_fs_delete_tree() because it saves us a 'kind'
check. Anyone opposed to losing svn_fs_delete(), and then renaming
svn_fs_delete_tree() to svn_fs_delete()? Am I missing something
obvious?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 4 23:47:13 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.