[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn_fs_delete() vs. svn_fs_delete_tree()

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-11-05 04:07:12 CET

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >For the life of me, I've never understood why we have both
> >svn_fs_delete() (which only works on files) and svn_fs_delete_tree()
> >(which works on both files and directories) in our public API. Our
> >code always calls svn_fs_delete_tree() because it saves us a 'kind'
> >check. Anyone opposed to losing svn_fs_delete(), and then renaming
> >svn_fs_delete_tree() to svn_fs_delete()? Am I missing something
> >obvious?
> >
> >
> Kill it. I'll even sharpen the guillotine for you. Anything that
> simplifies the FS API gets a +1 from me.

Consider it done. Thanks for the input, folks.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 5 04:08:24 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.