RE: ".svn" directory name no good (in fact, it is worse than I thought)

Isn't LGPL the one that allows you to distribute it w/o needing to
distribute your source?

I started w/ the GPL but then thought that would be the wrong one.

Should I change it??? I didn't want to require anyone to send their
source just because they used my proggie. It wasn't that big a deal
so I didn't see the need to require it.

Thoughts??

Shamim Islam
BA BS

Sander Striker (striker@apache.org) wrote:
>
>> From: Files [mailto:files@poetryunlimited.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:08 PM
>
>> Seconded here. Aren't "working copies" supposed to be localized anyway?
>>
>> I advocate adding my mvadminfrom shell script to the contrib directory as a
>
>-1 if it stays under the LGPL (didn't review what it does or how it works
>yet, only saw the license).
>
>
>Sander
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 25 18:46:45 2003