Re: ".svn" directory name no good (in fact, it is worse than I thought)

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-09-25 18:53:04 CEST

"Files" <files@poetryunlimited.com> writes:

> Isn't LGPL the one that allows you to distribute it w/o needing to
> distribute your source?

Well, it's not the *one* anything. Subversion's own license allows
this type of distribution.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 25 19:10:40 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: svn commit: rev 7193 - branches/svn-push"
Previous message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: email, WAS: RE: ".svn" directory name no good (in fact, it is worse than I thought)"
In reply to: Files: "RE: ".svn" directory name no good (in fact, it is worse than I thought)"
Next in thread: Ronald Cannes: "Re: ".svn" directory name no good (in fact, it is worse than I thought)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]