>B. W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com> writes
>>"Leeuw van der, Tim" <tim.leeuwvander@nl.unisys.com> writes:
>
> > I'm very sorry, but I don't see here a 'thinly veiled insult'. I don't
>see
> > here any sort of inflammatory language either.
>
>I took what he said:
>
> "...is something I'd expect from a production-quality versioning
> system (hence not POST 1.0)"
>
>as a coersion for putting this feature in Subversion. You don't have X.
>All good VC systems have X. If you want to consider yourself a good VC
>system, then you need to have X, otherwise, you apparently don't want to
>be a good VC system.
Don't confuse expressing expectations with insulting. My only goal with my
posts to this mailing list is to give constructive feedback and suggestions
(which you may disagree with) - certainly not insulting!
>But on top of that, I'm getting to be more and more cranky about new
>proposed 'features' for Subversion before we hit 1.0, before or after
>I've had my coffee.
If your plan is to move the CVS user base to Subversion, I suggest you get a
little less cranky.
_________________________________________________________________
Sign-up for a FREE BT Broadband connection today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 11 01:35:44 2003