RE: SVN API

Hiya,

I still don't read those words the same way as you do ;-) Perhaps because I
don't have to worry as much about all the feature-requests for SVN, and
perhaps because I can understand his expectation quite well.

Regards,

--Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: B. W. Fitzpatrick [mailto:fitz@red-bean.com]
Sent: woensdag 10 september 2003 16:26
To: Leeuw van der, Tim
Cc: Ronald Cannes; dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: SVN API

"Leeuw van der, Tim" <tim.leeuwvander@nl.unisys.com> writes:

> I'm very sorry, but I don't see here a 'thinly veiled insult'. I don't see
> here any sort of inflammatory language either.

I took what he said:

    "...is something I'd expect from a production-quality versioning
    system (hence not POST 1.0)"

as a coersion for putting this feature in Subversion. You don't have X.
All good VC systems have X. If you want to consider yourself a good VC
system, then you need to have X, otherwise, you apparently don't want to
be a good VC system.

> But I IMHO your reply can easily be read as insulting.

That's what I get for answering email before drinking my coffee in the
morning. :)

But on top of that, I'm getting to be more and more cranky about new
proposed 'features' for Subversion before we hit 1.0, before or after
I've had my coffee.

-Fitz

--
Brian W. Fitzpatrick    <fitz_at_red-bean.com>   http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org