Re: SVN API

"Leeuw van der, Tim" <tim.leeuwvander@nl.unisys.com> writes:

> I'm very sorry, but I don't see here a 'thinly veiled insult'. I don't see
> here any sort of inflammatory language either.

I took what he said:

    "...is something I'd expect from a production-quality versioning
    system (hence not POST 1.0)"

as a coersion for putting this feature in Subversion. You don't have X.
All good VC systems have X. If you want to consider yourself a good VC
system, then you need to have X, otherwise, you apparently don't want to
be a good VC system.

> But I IMHO your reply can easily be read as insulting.

That's what I get for answering email before drinking my coffee in the
morning. :)

But on top of that, I'm getting to be more and more cranky about new
proposed 'features' for Subversion before we hit 1.0, before or after
I've had my coffee.

-Fitz

--
Brian W. Fitzpatrick    <fitz_at_red-bean.com>   http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org