Tobias Ringström <tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> writes:
> cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> > Alternatively, we can roll the hot-backup.py functionality into an
> > 'svnadmin copy' command, and then lose the 'list-dblogs' subcommand
> > altogether.
>
> I think that would be a bad idea because it would limit the copying to
> local filsystems. What if I want to use scp? Such a command would also
> fail to help those who I prefer to back up using 'svnadmin dump', and
> still need to clean out the logs.
What a command fails to offer to a set of users who don't use that
command anyway is not really a big deal. I mean, do I care that tar
doesn't have bzip2 support? Not really, because I rarely use bzip2.
As for being limited to copying to local filesystems -- the same
limitation exists for hot-backup.py, and the only reason we would
write 'svnadmin copy' is to replace hot-backup.py. If you don't use
hot-backup.py as part of your backup strategy, this relocated
functionality (from a script to a core binary) won't affect you at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 25 20:07:13 2003