Jack Repenning wrote:
> At 9:32 AM +1200 8/6/03, Ralph Loader wrote:
>
>> What's wrong with the already implemented /!svn/ver/1234/ syntax?
>>
>> http://suckfish.mine.nu/svn/test/!svn/ver/10/subdir/foo.txt
>>
>
> This appears to be a "do it in the middle" idea, and subject to all the
> objections thereunto.
>
> It also appears to be using "ver" where it means "rev" (versions being
> deltas of particular files, whereas revisions are deltas of the whole
> repo).
>
> What is this "!svn" thing, anyway? I've seen it once or twice, but was
> not aware it was any sort of standard or consensus.
It's an implementation detail of libsvn_ra_dav and mod_dav_svn, and it's
one that we've already had to change once, so telling people to use it
seems like a bad idea.
-garrett
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 6 01:58:43 2003