What's wrong with the already implemented /!svn/ver/1234/ syntax?
http://suckfish.mine.nu/svn/test/!svn/ver/10/subdir/foo.txt
works for me.
Ralph.
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 05:19, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> "Russell Yanofsky" <rey4@columbia.edu> writes:
> > I haven't really been following this discussion, but why couldn't you just
> > use url query syntax for this, ie:
> >
> > http://host/repos/folder/file?rev=323
> >
> > That way there's no ambiguity, no naming restrictions, and no new rules for
> > escaping.
>
> Heh, I think you missed the beginning of the thread, in which Greg
> Hudson referred to this post
>
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2003-06/0024.shtml
>
> It explains why "path?rev=foo" is undesirable.
>
> -Karl
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 5 23:33:36 2003