[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Blast and issue 688 again

From: Glenn A. Thompson <gthompson_at_cdr.net>
Date: 2003-07-16 03:50:10 CEST


Branko ╚ibej wrote:

>Greg Hudson wrote:
>>You might be able to get the HPUX tests going by arranging to close the
>>first session before starting the second. But that would still be a
>>rather inefficient use of server resources. Actually fixing the problem
>>requires some thought, like maybe making svn_client__update_internal
>>accept an optional ra baton.
>I'm looking at that solution, yes -- but there's a catch. The sessions
>used by checkout and update aren't initialized in the same way, a few
>parameters are different. I don't know yet if it's O.K. to just modify
>the session params and keep on using it, or not.

Brane, I thought we semi agreed that this should be fixed in the FS.
 I'm pretty sure we can do it there with minimal impact.

.... Yes, I'm still around.

** gat mumbles something about figuring a way to get money without

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 16 03:54:13 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.