Re: Blast and issue 688 again

Greg Hudson wrote:

>You might be able to get the HPUX tests going by arranging to close the
>first session before starting the second. But that would still be a
>rather inefficient use of server resources. Actually fixing the problem
>requires some thought, like maybe making svn_client__update_internal
>accept an optional ra baton.
>
>
I'm looking at that solution, yes -- but there's a catch. The sessions
used by checkout and update aren't initialized in the same way, a few
parameters are different. I don't know yet if it's O.K. to just modify
the session params and keep on using it, or not.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org