[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Blast and issue 688 again

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-07-16 08:42:56 CEST

Glenn A. Thompson wrote:

> Hey,
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Greg Hudson wrote:
>>> You might be able to get the HPUX tests going by arranging to close the
>>> first session before starting the second. But that would still be a
>>> rather inefficient use of server resources. Actually fixing the
>>> problem
>>> requires some thought, like maybe making svn_client__update_internal
>>> accept an optional ra baton.
>> I'm looking at that solution, yes -- but there's a catch. The sessions
>> used by checkout and update aren't initialized in the same way, a few
>> parameters are different. I don't know yet if it's O.K. to just modify
>> the session params and keep on using it, or not.
> Brane, I thought we semi agreed that this should be fixed in the FS.
> I'm pretty sure we can do it there with minimal impact.
> .... Yes, I'm still around.
> gat
> ** gat mumbles something about figuring a way to get money without
> customers.

Fixing issue 688 in the FS is one thing. But what I want to do is fix
"svn co" to not try to open two sessions in the first place.

Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 16 08:43:53 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.