Glenn A. Thompson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> Greg Hudson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> You might be able to get the HPUX tests going by arranging to close the
>>> first session before starting the second. But that would still be a
>>> rather inefficient use of server resources. Actually fixing the
>>> problem
>>> requires some thought, like maybe making svn_client__update_internal
>>> accept an optional ra baton.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm looking at that solution, yes -- but there's a catch. The sessions
>> used by checkout and update aren't initialized in the same way, a few
>> parameters are different. I don't know yet if it's O.K. to just modify
>> the session params and keep on using it, or not.
>>
>
> Brane, I thought we semi agreed that this should be fixed in the FS.
> I'm pretty sure we can do it there with minimal impact.
>
> .... Yes, I'm still around.
> gat
>
> ** gat mumbles something about figuring a way to get money without
> customers.
Fixing issue 688 in the FS is one thing. But what I want to do is fix
"svn co" to not try to open two sessions in the first place.
--
Brane Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 16 08:43:53 2003