Re: Resolution of 'svn diff' change?

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> I do think folks should look at this seriously (unlike CMike's straw man
> with "svn diff --compare" followed by any even number of arguments), but
> I'm not 100% convinced that it's better than having an iterative "svn
> diff" and a comparative "svn compare" and just punting the "iterate
> within a comparison" functionality.

So ... if not 100%, then how much? :-)

Seriously, we could bat this issue around for weeks trying to make
diff do everything possible, but I think our only real responsibility
is to solve the most common use-cases without cutting off the ability
for folks to write scripts for their specific use-cases (that we don't
support directly).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 19 20:27:13 2003