Re: Resolution of 'svn diff' change?

On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 14:02, Scott Lamb wrote:
> On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 12:45 US/Central, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
> > svn diff [--old=old-target] [--new=new-target] [file1 file2 ...]
>
> Plus a [-r M[:N]], I assume?

Well, -r M would be shorthand for "--old=my-wc-url@M" and -r M:N would
be shorthand for --old=my-wc-url@M --new=my-wc-url@N. But yeah, we'd
probably have to allow them for ease of use.

I do think folks should look at this seriously (unlike CMike's straw man
with "svn diff --compare" followed by any even number of arguments), but
I'm not 100% convinced that it's better than having an iterative "svn
diff" and a comparative "svn compare" and just punting the "iterate
within a comparison" functionality.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 19 20:13:11 2003