Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Issue #1295 (take 5)

On 13 May 2003 kfogel@collab.net wrote:

> After a few cycles of this, there is nothing obviously wrong with the
> patch. It just needs a detailed review & test, followed (we hope) by
> application. That's all much more time-consuming than the earlier

Is there anything I can do to help? I've tested it with my own SVN repos
since I posted it, no problems found so far. Problems in it would probably
be found pretty quick. The code is in the path for every commit with the
command line client?

> This pattern is exacerbated when the patch is for a feature that
> doesn't block 1.0. It's much lower on everyone's priority list then

True. But it's a usability thing and really effects UI. It would be great
to get it out there for 1.0 so people get familiar with that kind of
behavior.

> Regarding issue #1295 specifically, I just noticed now that the issue
> is marked "Resolved->Invalid" by Mark Benedetto King, saying:

Actually, I did the first patch before the issue got marked Invalid. :-)

L8r,
Mark G.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 13 21:52:04 2003