Re: svn commit: rev 5814 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc tests/clients/cmdline

Philip Martin wrote:

>Branko ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>
>>Philip Martin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I am wary of this removal of missing directories, does it mean that
>>>the sequence
>>>
>>> svn mkdir foo
>>> mv foo bar
>>> svn up
>>>
>>>will remove the foo entry? If so, it would fall into the "I don't
>>>expect that to happen" category.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I think there should be an "except..." clause there. :-)
>>"Except if the entry is marked as moved". Of course, we don't do that
>>yet -- but we should, to support atomic renames on the client side.
>>
>>
>
>That's not an 'svn mv', just a plain mv, so that foo is missing.
>
>

Oh duh, right. Silly me. Sorry.

Your example is still good; that entry shouldn't be removed just because
the directory is missing. Instead, the "svn up" should pull a new copy
of foo.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org