Re: svn commit: rev 5814 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc tests/clients/cmdline

Branko ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> >>>I am wary of this removal of missing directories, does it mean that
> >>>the sequence
> >>>
> >>> svn mkdir foo
> >>> mv foo bar
> >>> svn up
> >>>
> >>>will remove the foo entry? If so, it would fall into the "I don't
> >>>expect that to happen" category.
> >>>
> >>I think there should be an "except..." clause there. :-)
> >>"Except if the entry is marked as moved". Of course, we don't do that
> >>yet -- but we should, to support atomic renames on the client side.
> >
> >That's not an 'svn mv', just a plain mv, so that foo is missing.
>
> Oh duh, right. Silly me. Sorry.
>
> Your example is still good; that entry shouldn't be removed just because
> the directory is missing. Instead, the "svn up" should pull a new copy
> of foo.

:) It can't do that either... it's not been committed.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org