Re: [PATCH] Issue #1075

On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 10:51:33AM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
>
> My only concern is how svn_wc__do_update_cleanup() plugs into
> svn_wc_add(). If I understand the code correctly, your new goodness
> will get called any time svn_wc_add is called on a directory with
> copyfrom args. I don't think we want that behavior at all.

am i correct in thinking that the use case that would trigger this
codepath is if you do an 'svn cp' on a directory that contains a
missing directory?

what is correct behavior in that case? the missing directory is also
missing in the copy?

(the reason i ask is, as it turns out, the above use case errors out
before even getting to the point at which svn_wc__do_update_cleanup
would be called).

-brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 28 19:42:34 2003