Re: [RFC/PATCH] Revamping ra_svn tunnel agents

On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 03:00:09PM +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 11:41:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I do find it strange that we could have a scheme where both the common
> > Internet scheme syntax (RFC 1738) and a different scheme syntax were
> > valid, i.e. svn://host/path and svn:ssh://host/path. And, if you're
> > going to do the latter, the second : is really unnecessary. So I think I
> > would find svn+ssh less confusing from the point of view of working out
> > what URLs really mean.
>
> Well, since we're coming up with weird and wonderful ways to say this,
> how about:
>
> svn://ssh:blah.example.com/path/to/repos/
> svn://ssh@blah.example.com/path/to/repos/
> etc.

I considered suggesting that, but unfortunately the second clashes with
the user[:password]@ part of the common syntax, and I tend to think that
the first is uncomfortably close.

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org