[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Revamping ra_svn tunnel agents

From: Jani Averbach <jaa_at_cc.jyu.fi>
Date: 2003-04-27 12:55:25 CEST

On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Greg Hudson wrote:

> > So from a technical perspective, I'm not really sure which is
> > better: my patch, with the libsvn_ra hack to allow "+foo" suffixes
> > in URL schemes, or your suggestion, which plays with the URL syntax.
>
> mbk weighed in in favor of svn:scheme: over IRC, and I don't have a
> strong opinion, so it's currently 2 to 0 for svn:scheme:. So if you
> had your heart set on svn+scheme:, speak up soon or suffer the agony
> of witnessing an improperly painted bikeshed.
>

I have a somekind of déjà vu.
http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2002-07/2187.shtml

I think that the svn:scheme: would be better, at least java uses samekind
of syntax (jdbc:protocol:).

But if you count only "the beuty and art of looks of url", I think
that svn+ssh is better. =)

BR, Jani

-- 
Jani Averbach
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 27 12:56:20 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.