Re: [RFC/PATCH] Revamping ra_svn tunnel agents

On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 11:41:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[snip]
> I do find it strange that we could have a scheme where both the common
> Internet scheme syntax (RFC 1738) and a different scheme syntax were
> valid, i.e. svn://host/path and svn:ssh://host/path. And, if you're
> going to do the latter, the second : is really unnecessary. So I think I
> would find svn+ssh less confusing from the point of view of working out
> what URLs really mean.

Well, since we're coming up with weird and wonderful ways to say this,
how about:

        svn://ssh:blah.example.com/path/to/repos/
        svn://ssh@blah.example.com/path/to/repos/
        etc.

> (Not that I actually have a vote or anything.)

Same here.

-- 
Michael Wood <mwood@its.uct.ac.za>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org