[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: production ready?

From: B. W. Fitzpatrick <fitz_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2003-04-21 22:19:13 CEST

rbraswell@connected.com writes:
> Ok.. So am I better of using CVS until 1.0 ships, or do you feel that a
> pre-release subversion build is better than the current release of cvs?

I think that you're better off with a pre-release of Subversion than
the current release of CVS if you don't mind following the Subversion
announcements list and upgrading your Subversion installation every
month or six weeks until it hits 1.0 (and this includes a possible
repository dump/reload or 2).

In spite of it's pre-1.0 status and a few mildly annoying bugs,
Subversion is already a great improvement on CVS. Once Subversion
hit's 1.0, it will be many times better than CVS. Inertia dictates
that it will be easier to start with Subversion than to switch to it

If you care about your developers and want to make their lives easier,
use Subversion.

If you don't like them, go with CVS.


Brian W. Fitzpatrick    <fitz_at_red-bean.com>   http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 21 22:20:01 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.