[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: production ready?

From: <rbraswell_at_connected.com>
Date: 2003-04-21 22:06:55 CEST

Ok.. So am I better of using CVS until 1.0 ships, or do you feel that a
pre-release subversion build is better than the current release of cvs?

Thanks for your help...and humor!


-----Original Message-----
From: cmpilato@collab.net [mailto:cmpilato@collab.net]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 3:44 PM
To: rbraswell@connected.com
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: production ready?

rbraswell@connected.com writes:

> So what is the projected release date for 1.0? I would be hard pressed to
> convince my boss that we should deploy a pre-release version. My problem
> time. I need to replace our present source control system in the next 2 or
> months.

2 or 3 months won't yield Subversion 1.0, I am confident of that.

It'd be a shame to lose your interest over the matter of a version
number, but I understand how those fears come into play. If it's any
comfort, Subversion has been self-hosting (that is, the code to
Subversion has been stored in Subversion itself) for well over a year
now, and to date we've never suffered any lossage. There are
certainly still bugs (as is demonstrated by our healthy Issues website
page), but generally speaking, the software is quite useful for
typical versioning operations.

> ...as for the dancing...does that cost extra ;)

Yes, dancing comes at an additional fee, but if you can get your boss
to drop those "version number blinders", I'd be willing to waive that
cost. :-)
Received on Mon Apr 21 22:08:00 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.