Re: svn commit: rev 5663 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_client libsvn_subr libsvn_wc

cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:
>
> > But the new logic is bogus because it's not checking for a specific
> > error. For example, it might treat the tree as unversioned when what
> > really happened was that the tree was locked by someone else. If it
> > fails to get a baton, we need to check *why* it failed. As long as
> > the reason is that we were requesting an access baton for an
> > unversioned tree, then we can set entry to NULL and proceed;
> > otherwise, we should return an error.
> >
> > Does that seem sensible to you too?
>
> Yep, that makes sense to me.

Cool.

(Do me a favor and review the commit when you see it, though, would
ya?)

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 18 22:08:28 2003