Re: svn commit: rev 5663 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_client libsvn_subr libsvn_wc

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> But the new logic is bogus because it's not checking for a specific
> error. For example, it might treat the tree as unversioned when what
> really happened was that the tree was locked by someone else. If it
> fails to get a baton, we need to check *why* it failed. As long as
> the reason is that we were requesting an access baton for an
> unversioned tree, then we can set entry to NULL and proceed;
> otherwise, we should return an error.
>
> Does that seem sensible to you too?

Yep, that makes sense to me.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 18 21:45:16 2003