Re: svn:original-date
From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-03-19 00:52:34 CET
=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >If DATE->REVNUM is more efficient, then +1 on that, and -0 on DATE->TXN_ID.
Redundancy, redundancy, yuck, yuck, yuck. But do whatcha want. Kinda
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.