Re: svn:original-date

Greg Stein wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 01:24:51PM -0600, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
>
>
>>+1, almost. Would rather do DATE->TXN_ID (that way we can get both
>>committed and uncommitted transactions).
>>
>>
>
>As long as you have a way to go from TXN_ID to revnum(?).
>
Oh, yes. For a committed txn, that's no problem. For an uncommitted one,
only Buddha can find the revnum. :-)

[snip]

>I don't see a need to *find* a transaction by date. I can see wanting to
>sort the transactions, but I think it would be fine to get the list of txns
>and then sort the results.
>
Perhaps not today, but very probably someday. Dunno...

>If DATE->REVNUM is more efficient, then +1 on that, and -0 on DATE->TXN_ID.
>
How about DATE->(TXN_ID [REVNUM])? Two stones with one bird. :-)

>So I'll make you a trade. I'll remove the prop if you add the table :-)
>
Oooh, let me, let me! I haven't done any real work in the FS for ages,
and it would be so nice to remember the grand old days again. Right
after I put in the svn_filesize_t change.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org