[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Conform to O'Reilly style guide

From: Larry Shatzer <fugazi_at_zyx.net>
Date: 2003-03-14 19:47:10 CET

On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:36:27PM -0500, Paul Lussier wrote:
> If it's 'file server' why is it 'filename'?
>
> IMO, it should be 'file server' and 'file name'. The noun is 'name'
> and it's being modified by 'file' as an adjective to describe what
> type of 'name' is being referenced. Same goes for 'file server'.
>
> I can live with 'fileserver' and 'filename' if that's the concensus/
> decision of those actually writing the book, but I'll at least cast a
> +1 for consistency if my +1 for 'file name' is voted against :)

Taken from the word list in the O'Reilly Style Guide, it lists the following:

  filename
  file manager
  file server
  filesystem
  file type

Ultimately in the end, the editor assigned this will make the appropriate edits
to make it conform to their standard. I figure might as well make their job a
little more easy.

> As for 'can not' vs. 'cannot' my prefererence is for the former vs.
> the latter, but either is acceptable according to Webster's :)

Again, taken from the word list:

  cannot or can't (not "can not")

In any case, the book has it mixed both ways. Converting it to this was also
less work.

-- Larry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 14 19:48:35 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.