Re: Seeing the light

=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> I think it would be a good idea if you took a look at the issue 1003
> branch. That issue is supposed to be fixed there, _and_ we have
> svn_fs_rename for atomic renames.
>
> I wonder if we can get that merged in for 0.18, so that we don't need
> yet anoter schema change afterwards?

No, we can't. Bill's change is a fairly hefty one (not so much in
code thrash, but conceptually), and I'm not going to rush the review
of that. I *am* in the process of reviewing it, though.

As for schema changes, why would we need "yet another" ? Glenn's work
isn't about changing the schema -- it's about changing the code. To
date, the only schema change I am aware of is the 1003 branch.

That said, Glenn, I don't think Bill's work will interfere with the
first of your three listed tasks -- in other words, I don't think the
issue 1003 branch will be of any real interest to you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Feb 15 03:38:59 2003