Glenn A. Thompson wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I'm beginning to see some light in the rather bizarre tunnel I've been
> in:-)
>
> So I'm going to jump into my fs patch again. Assuming the water is
> still fine.
>
> The next three changes were to be:
> 1. Move db code from fs.c to bdb/bdb-fs.c, maintaining the public API
> as-is.
> 2. The db_cntxt changes.
> 3. The "inner vtables" changes.
>
> My situation has prevented me from keeping up with the list much at
> all. Do my plans still make sense?
> Any big changes other than CheckSums and uuids I should take note of?
> I know there are other small ones.
> Also, if anyone can suggest some "must read" threads I should take a
> look at; I will greatly appreciate it. The 2900+ unread posts in my
> Subversion inbox has frankly got me feeling like I'm in one of those
> Sprint commercials. I have "unread", "clueless", and "out of the loop"
> on my forehead.
> Someone please hand me a clue and tell me I'm going to be fine:-)
I think it would be a good idea if you took a look at the issue 1003
branch. That issue is supposed to be fixed there, _and_ we have
svn_fs_rename for atomic renames.
I wonder if we can get that merged in for 0.18, so that we don't need
yet anoter schema change afterwards?
--
Brane Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Feb 15 01:00:28 2003