Re: Seeing the light

cmpilato@collab.net wrote:

>=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>
>>I think it would be a good idea if you took a look at the issue 1003
>>branch. That issue is supposed to be fixed there, _and_ we have
>>svn_fs_rename for atomic renames.
>>
>>I wonder if we can get that merged in for 0.18, so that we don't need
>>yet anoter schema change afterwards?
>>
>>
>
>No, we can't. Bill's change is a fairly hefty one (not so much in
>code thrash, but conceptually), and I'm not going to rush the review
>of that. I *am* in the process of reviewing it, though.
>
Yeah, I figured something like that.

>As for schema changes, why would we need "yet another" ? Glenn's work
>isn't about changing the schema -- it's about changing the code. To
>date, the only schema change I am aware of is the 1003 branch.
>
What about the repository UUIDs? That change goes into 0.18; Bill's
change is the "yet another" that'll obviously go into 0.19.

>That said, Glenn, I don't think Bill's work will interfere with the
>first of your three listed tasks -- in other words, I don't think the
>issue 1003 branch will be of any real interest to you.
>
>
Yes, most of thos changes are probably in the DAG and tree interfaces.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org