Re: libsvn_auth

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:

> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> >It seems ridiculous to have a bunch of sequenced providers in this
> >case. I imagine a single provider like this:
> >
> > * honor --username/--password first
> > * then look in wc
> > * then getuid
> >
> >There's no point in prompting. getuid can't possibly fail; only the
> >first two methods may be unavailable.
> >
> >
> Really? I can imagine a situation on Windows where getuid (or the
> equivalent) can fail -- at least, the conversion from uid to string
> could concievably fail.

Leave it to Win32 to blow apart my reality. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 5 03:20:30 2003