Re: libsvn_auth

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

>Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>
>>Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>It seems ridiculous to have a bunch of sequenced providers in this
>>>case. I imagine a single provider like this:
>>>
>>> * honor --username/--password first
>>> * then look in wc
>>> * then getuid
>>>
>>>There's no point in prompting. getuid can't possibly fail; only the
>>>first two methods may be unavailable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Really? I can imagine a situation on Windows where getuid (or the
>>equivalent) can fail -- at least, the conversion from uid to string
>>could concievably fail.
>>
>>
>
>Leave it to Win32 to blow apart my reality. :-)
>
>
Imagine how it feels not knowing who you're logged in as. :-)

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org