Re: libsvn_auth

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

>It seems ridiculous to have a bunch of sequenced providers in this
>case. I imagine a single provider like this:
>
> * honor --username/--password first
> * then look in wc
> * then getuid
>
>There's no point in prompting. getuid can't possibly fail; only the
>first two methods may be unavailable.
>
>
Really? I can imagine a situation on Windows where getuid (or the
equivalent) can fail -- at least, the conversion from uid to string
could concievably fail.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org