Re: [PATCH] run hook-scripts on WIN32

cmpilato@collab.net wrote:

>=?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>
>>>Of course, while typing the above, I realized that if we really wanted
>>>to, we could probably have 'svnserve' be that process (if running in
>>>daemon mode)...hm...
>>>
>>>
>>Think again. We need a sentinel process that can react to dying clients
>>and force a cleanup at the next reconnect; we don _not_ need yet another
>>server layer running all the time.
>>
>>
>
>Oh, my phrasing was wrong. I didn't mean to imply that we should use
>svnserve to get general support on Win9x. I meant only that we could
>make this a perk of using the ra-svn protocol. But yeah, a sentinel
>would do the job more universally. Heck, if you write it for Windows,
>you might as well do the same for the other platforms. Surely they
>could all benefit from a hovering cleaner-upper process.
>
>

Not just benefit -- we need that in order to avoid the stuck-repository
problem.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org