[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bdb 4.1 really necessary? (was: Re: Caught a hung svn server)

From: Brandon Ehle <azverkan_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2003-01-13 21:53:18 CET

solo turn wrote:

>why is it necessary to support version 4.1? it seems to be a
>shortterm-version. and the functionality is anyway not needed for
>why am i asking this?
>i checked the "known bugs" on sleepycat.com. as for what is fixed in
>4.1, and 4.2, it seems that 4.1 does a few bugfixes from 4.0, and new
>stuff, and 4.2 again does bugfixes for things introduced in 4.1, but
>it has a quite impressive number of bugs fixed (which seem to be in
>4.1). 4.2 should be out sometime this summer.
See Bug 995, DB4.0.X is unusable for large repositories.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 13 21:50:54 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.