[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: bdb 4.1 really necessary? (was: Re: Caught a hung svn server)

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-01-13 22:43:41 CET

Brandon Ehle wrote:

> solo turn wrote:
>
>> why is it necessary to support version 4.1? it seems to be a
>> shortterm-version. and the functionality is anyway not needed for
>> svn.
>>
>> why am i asking this?
>> i checked the "known bugs" on sleepycat.com. as for what is fixed in
>> 4.1, and 4.2, it seems that 4.1 does a few bugfixes from 4.0, and new
>> stuff, and 4.2 again does bugfixes for things introduced in 4.1, but
>> it has a quite impressive number of bugs fixed (which seem to be in
>> 4.1). 4.2 should be out sometime this summer.
>>
>>
> See Bug 995, DB4.0.X is unusable for large repositories.
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=995

And DB4.0.x happens not to work on Mac OS X, at least.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 13 22:45:05 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.