[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

bdb 4.1 really necessary? (was: Re: Caught a hung svn server)

From: solo turn <soloturn99_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2003-01-13 21:39:05 CET

why is it necessary to support version 4.1? it seems to be a
shortterm-version. and the functionality is anyway not needed for
svn.

why am i asking this?
i checked the "known bugs" on sleepycat.com. as for what is fixed in
4.1, and 4.2, it seems that 4.1 does a few bugfixes from 4.0, and new
stuff, and 4.2 again does bugfixes for things introduced in 4.1, but
it has a quite impressive number of bugs fixed (which seem to be in
4.1). 4.2 should be out sometime this summer.

--- Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com> wrote:
> I just discovered that I have a hung svn server (rev 4259).
>
> I've attached the server-status page. The server responds to the
> top level HTML page, but any requests to the repository hang.
>
> This is on RedHat 8.0 with db 4.1.25 and apr/apr-util and http2
> -r APACHE_2_0_BRANCH from 1/4/2003.
>

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 13 21:39:46 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.