Re: svn 1.0 in 2006 or now?

On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:30:56AM +0100, Steinar Bang wrote:
> >>>>> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>:
>
> >>>>> Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net>:
> > [...]
> >> The kinds of users who depend mainly on the label -- "1.0",
> >> "stable", whatever -- to decide whether or not to try Subversion,
> >> are exactly the kinds who will be put off if they encounter a seg
> >> fault or an obvious bug.
>
> > Not neccessarily. I'm someone who's waiting for "1.0" to do the
> > switch from CVS. But once the switch is done I won't be going back
> > even if I encounter the odd seg fault or two.

Then feel free to switch now. We've been using it ourselves for practically
18 months. Once we called it "alpha", that meant it was ready for people to
start trying it out: all the day-to-day features are in and working.

> One thing that _would_ scare me away, is data corruption.

Hasn't happened yet.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org