[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.0 in 2006 or now?

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2003-01-08 01:04:56 CET

On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:30:56AM +0100, Steinar Bang wrote:
> >>>>> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>:
> >>>>> Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net>:
> > [...]
> >> The kinds of users who depend mainly on the label -- "1.0",
> >> "stable", whatever -- to decide whether or not to try Subversion,
> >> are exactly the kinds who will be put off if they encounter a seg
> >> fault or an obvious bug.
> > Not neccessarily. I'm someone who's waiting for "1.0" to do the
> > switch from CVS. But once the switch is done I won't be going back
> > even if I encounter the odd seg fault or two.

Then feel free to switch now. We've been using it ourselves for practically
18 months. Once we called it "alpha", that meant it was ready for people to
start trying it out: all the day-to-day features are in and working.

> One thing that _would_ scare me away, is data corruption.

Hasn't happened yet.


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 8 01:04:14 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.