[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.0 in 2006 or now?

From: Steinar Bang <sb_at_dod.no>
Date: 2003-01-08 00:30:56 CET

>>>>> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>:

>>>>> Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net>:
> [...]
>> The kinds of users who depend mainly on the label -- "1.0",
>> "stable", whatever -- to decide whether or not to try Subversion,
>> are exactly the kinds who will be put off if they encounter a seg
>> fault or an obvious bug.

> Not neccessarily. I'm someone who's waiting for "1.0" to do the
> switch from CVS. But once the switch is done I won't be going back
> even if I encounter the odd seg fault or two.

One thing that _would_ scare me away, is data corruption.

Happened to me with CVS in 1991, and I didn't try it again until 1995.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 8 00:31:42 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.