Re: Repository GUIDs again
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:08:21PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Karl Fogel <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > "Bill Tutt" <email@example.com> writes:
> > > That makes sense. However, I think I'd rather just have the rev-prop
> > > modification code (above the level that svnadmin would use to change it)
> > > disallow the changing the property be hardcoded.
> > Yah, +1, people replace/rewrite hooks all the time.
> Actually, why again did we decide to store it as a revprop on 0?
In order to avoid creating a new API for accessing that bit from the
"NT is to UNIX what a doughnut is to a particle accelerator."
Received on Wed Jan 8 00:28:59 2003
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev