Re: Using APACHE_2_0_BRANCH not HEAD was Re: recent apr change?

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> --On Monday, January 6, 2003 1:05 PM -0600 Ben Collins-Sussman
> <sussman@collab.net> wrote:
>
> > We're releasing svn 0.16.1 later today. We're going to test against
> > the latest httpd-2.1/apr tarball, which we'll upload to the svn site
> > (so that it doesn't disappear.) This will allow branko's UTF8 stuff
> > and jerenkrantz' mod-dav locknig stuff to work correctly.
>
> Oh, hmm, I forgot about that.
>
> I think you might be better off if you use APACHE_2_0_BRANCH of httpd
> and HEAD of apr. HEAD of httpd has some weird stuff in it right now.
> I wouldn't consider the mod_dav_lock stuff essential. mod_dav_svn
> should work just fine without it - provided that the ap_provider API
> is present.
>
> Feel free to also revert the commit to mod_dav_svn that calls
> ap_lookup_provider just for that tag if you like. Or, however you'd
> do that in subversion. I'm not really sure. =) It'd be a good
> exercise, methinks. (Actually, how would you do this?) -- justin

I've been using the head of APACHE_2_0_BRANCH against rev 4259 with
no issues (4257 was the last rev that changed the mod_dav_svn stuff).

To revert them, there's two noncontiguous commits. So

svn merge -r 4257:4256 .
svn merge -r 4255:4254 .

would do the trick.

Best,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>
Plots of your system's performance - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org